If your compliance data needs a browser, it is not really available
A dashboard is a way to look at data. It is not a way to use it.
Regulators require a program. Most platforms ship a list with a status column.
Consumer complaint handling is one of the most consistently criticized areas in consumer lending enforcement, and the criticism is rarely that complaints were not recorded. It is that they were handled as individual events rather than as a program.
The distinction has teeth. A table tells you what was raised. A program has a clock, an owner, a resolution standard, a consequence, and a pattern view.
It is commercially uncomfortable. It delays a contractor's payment over a dispute that may turn out to be unfounded, and contractors will object. It is also the single most effective mechanism available, because it aligns everyone's incentive toward resolving the matter quickly.
A complaint that does not stop money is a complaint that nobody has to resolve urgently.
The way to make it acceptable rather than punitive is symmetry: the pause is automatic, the contractor can put their side on the record in writing, and the pause lifts automatically on resolution. Nobody is adjudicating it in a phone call the contractor was not on.
Ask what happens to a pending draw when a borrower disputes the work. If the answer is "nothing automatic", you have a table.
Pick a closed project. We will show you the document you would hand a regulator. If it does not answer the question, nothing else matters.